Re: being up to date (Was: insserv + apache2 + bind9 = pain)
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Mike Bird <mgb-debian@yosemite.net> wrote:
> On Wed January 5 2011 13:37:59 Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
>> > mgb-debian@yosemite.net :
>> > The issue is that insserv throws away
>> > years of work by Debian Developers,
>>
>> That is not always bad.
>> Computers have improved during the last years, why not their OSes?
>>
>> compiz, upstart, lxc,... are "modern" tools for modern use :-)
>
> Change can be good or bad.
>
> Hardware and software improvements are generally beneficial.
>
> Throwing away years of DD work and thereby causing innumerable
> previously rock-solid Debian servers to fail to boot is not.
You keep asserting that 'years of DD work have been thrown away'. You
do realise the ordering is still there, right? It's now in the LSB
headers rather than the scripts numbering scheme.
Reply to: