Re: Debian FS structure.
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:56:12 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 31 July 2010 10:38:28 Camaleón wrote:
>> > He will never buy the last two links. They don't say they are the
>> > "Official Debian Way".
>>
>> Why not? As long as Debian sticks to FSH 2.3 (with the exceptions
>> mentioned in the first link from Debian Policy Manual) I think the last
>> two links full match his requirements and better yet, explain the
>> "which dir if for what" question.
>
> I think that you have missed the humour, Camaleón. That is the
> difficulty of a cross-culture, cross-language ml. :-(
Oh... I thought it was a real "complain" or so it appears if someone
comes to the list and reads the thread. I just wanted to clarify a bit
the context, meaning, we (Debian) are in the standard path :-)
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: