Re: Fwd: Re: Kde 3.5 ...
I'm sorry, maybe I'm to new to all this stuff and to old fashioned but
isn't the point in new version make her free of bugs, faster, lighter
etc.? Whats happened to KISS?
Please do not judge KDE4 by not being a copy of KDE 3.5. If that was the
case, there would be no point in making a new version anyway. The
important question is whether KDE lacks functionality that should be
there (this includes, but is not limited to, functionality present in
KDE <4) and if that's the case, file a bug report. But of course, don't
be bothered if the functionality *looks* different. Again, if all the
functionality would look the same, there would be no point creating a
When I was on Windows I hate so much when in every new version
everything was different and I was losing days to find old options.
There are to much things that are useful in KDE 3 and now are gone.
What was wrong with system:// in Konqueror, different background for
different desktop, Quanta, less usage of ram, look and feel.
All that stuff people love and use in everyday life. Is it cubic desktop
switching useful? No it's just eye candy.
I really can't see why is KDE 4 better. If anybody can please explain me
because I really don't see even one reason.
One more thing, I don't wont offend anybody. That vas just my thought
and thought of ather people that I see on the net since the KDE 4 came out.
I know that this mail will not change the thought of developers and this
is not reason why I was writhing it.
Registered Linux User #503414