Re: Is Squeeze right for me?
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:00:50 +0000
Lisi <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 21 November 2009 18:47:38 Chris wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:41:18 +0000
> > Lisi <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 21 November 2009 18:05:40 Chris wrote:
> > > > While Ubu 9.10 (assuming) is *nice and flashy*
> > >
> > > To some of us, well one of me anyway, that is a contradiction in
> > > terms. Something cannot be both nice and flashy - it must be
> > > either or. ;-)
> > >
> > > Lisi
> > ... Redefined... Ubu 9.10 (assuming) is both nice (to use, as in
> > ease) AND flashy (visually). Not a contradiction at all.
> > Perhaps I should have taken the time to define that however, knowing
> > the Op was using Ubu to begin with, I assumed the Op knew exactly
> > what I meant and how it was meant.
> That was exactly what I took you to mean. I just don't agree with
> you. For me it is a contradiction in terms. And I did make it clear
> a) that I realise that I may be in a small minority in that and b)
> that I was not entirely serious.
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1"