Re: How to replicate the behaviour of /usr/local [SOLVED]
Dne, 20. 10. 2009 09:31:38 je Vincenzo Tibullo napisal(a):
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Il giorno Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:55:37 +0200
> Klistvud <quotations@aliceadsl.fr> ha scritto:
>
> | Dne, 16. 10. 2009 12:50:43 je Klistvud napisal(a):
> | > Dne, 16. 10. 2009 12:19:03 je Cameron Hutchison napisal(a):
> | > > Klistvud <quotations@aliceadsl.fr> writes:
> | > >
> ...
> | > >
> | > > # chgrp users /path/to/shared/directory
> | > > # chmod g+s /path/to/shared/directory
> | > >
> ...
> |
> | Anybody care to chime in? The question was: how does /usr/local
> | manage to assign a predefined group ownership to every file you
> copy
> | to /usr/ local? Can such behaviour be replicated for an arbitrary
> | directory in my /home subtree?
> |
>
> You have received the correct answer from Cameron, what else you
> want?
>
> If you copy or create a file, it works exactly as /usr/local, the
> file
> has the same group as the destination dir.
> If you move a file, it works exactly as /usr/local, the file retains
> its group.
>
>
> - --
> Vincenzo Tibullo
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkrdZ1oACgkQVC1WJss4YhefAQCfbA9DjgiIU5xLXdPvr98X65cj
> rZwAn2NXJHdrysHRoPYKLIy80Z33dtiK
> =T9zZ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
<BLUSH>
You're so right. I've been trying out Cameron's solution through a nfs
share; it seems that the directory listing was cached or whatever, fact
is, the changed permissions from previous attempts weren't updated on
my local display and were still showing the permissions from *before* I
had actually applied Cameron's instructions. Apologies to Cameron and
all other listers who might have gotten misled by my ramblings...
</BLUSH>
--
Regards,
Klistvud
Certifiable Loonix User #481801
Reply to: