Re: memory problem
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 06:22:29PM -0600, lostson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 01:13 +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:41:49 -0500
> > "Douglas A. Tutty" <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > Note also that the description of iceweasel is that it is lightweight.
> > Well, I think this can be removed since Iceweasel/Firefox isn't
> > lightweight anymore.
> I hate to butt in but do you see better behavior and performance from
> say epiphany or galeon or some other browser ?
Konqueror. Surprised me a lot. Sure it uses resources, but it doesn't
seem to leak them.
I only use Iceweasel for sites that don't work with Konq.