Re: Fw: Shorewall with Debian
Thanks for the reply,
I admit, yes, it was mistake to create both NIC on the same subnet, though I need to study more about this
'ping 10.1.1.5' on my Debian
- with eth0 only, resulting: From 10.1.1.4 icmp_seq=10 Destination Host Unreachable
- with eth1 only, resulting: 64bytes from 10.1.1.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=125 time=0.080ms
Please guide me
If I still want to make the same IPs on each NIC, subnetting /8 and /24 will solve the problem?
With eth1 connected, I can log in into my Webmin either by address https://10.1.1.1:10000 or https://10.1.1.4:10000 from other host (e.g. 10.1.1.5)
why is that?
----- Original Message ----
From: subscriptions <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Phillipus Gunawan <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2008 3:17:31 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Shorewall with Debian
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 04:58 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
> Another things that bothering me
> I am using class A network as 10.1.1.x/24, subnet 255.0.0.0
> ~# ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:4C:50:18:FD
> inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.255.255.255
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:4C:50:16:70
> inet addr:10.1.1.4 Bcast:10.255.255.255
Above does not look right! E.g. a 'ping -b 10.1.1.255', where does it
end up; eth0 or eth1?
Simpler is to use ip from different ranges, or use proper masking. Read
into how networking and routing works.
> Isn't this is OK for private network?
> I used this IP to set up few offices using Winblow AD and it is always working OK
But how are the Windows communicating, through IP or Samba (not Samba
over IP obviously).
> Anyone want to comment on this?
> Off course any answer for my solution always warmly welcome... :)
> And yes, I did read the 'two-interfaces' and 'three-interfaces' examples
> This is why I post my questions, because I still can't make it work.... :(
Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a Sony Bravia TV. Enter now http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/?p1=other&p2=au&p3=tagline