Re: Procmail filters debian-user mails as spam
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:36:43PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,28.Jul.08, 14:57:16, Arvind Marathe wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Andrei Popescu
> > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > On Sun,27.Jul.08, 17:07:29, Arvind Marathe wrote:
> > >
> > >> OK some more investigation. All the d-u mails, getting listed as spam,
> > >> have X-Spam-Checker-Version, X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status, in their
> > >> headers. For eg. one of the mails has:
> > >>
> > >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on liszt.debian.org
> > >> X-Spam-Level:
> > >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=MDO_DATING2 autolearn=no version=3.2.3
> > >>
> > >> Andrei's mails and the mutt mailing list mails do not have these
> > >> headers.
> > >
> > > Gee, glad to know I'm special cased! I think it's actually due to the
> > > fact that I'm using gmail as well.
> > I don't think so. I still think it is because you "cc" to me. All
> > mails that were "cc"ed to me were dumped fine. And my own mails (from
> > gmail) to the list, which did not have my address as "cc", were dumped
> > as spam.
> Hhmm, interesting...
> > > Are you sure you don't want to try
> > > maildrop instead of procmail?
> > Busy right now, but won't mind trying it after a few days. Is it
> > better than procmail? how?
> Because you can actually read the rules? :) Don't worry, it's just a
> matter of preference, like vim vs. emacs, KDE vs. Gnome. You will find
> strong advocates on both sides, but in the end it's a matter of
Hmm - i have only used procmail. Sometime i will try maildrop.
Depending on whether i like it, i'll join one of the camps and either
credit you or curse you ;)
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.