Re: Help filing bug report; can't use automated tool, does this report look OK?
Arthur A <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Celejar wrote:
> > [snip]
> > I have reported a version of this to upstream (as per a request by one of the DDs in a similar bug log:
> > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16262
> > See also:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465694
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432110
> Since then I've removed that line from xorg.conf and removed the libflash.so
> plugin (I'd be using 10 beta). I've installed gnash, but really, I'm just doing
> without flash. I've no reason to suspect flash is at fault, it's just something
Really? You don't consider flash a horribly buggy, poorly implemented
disaster? Huh. "This Shockwave Flash file type is known to ..."
Finding it to actually work is a surprise, here. Usually it's kill
-HUP $(pidof swf), and I get my browser back.
Admittedly, this is etch.
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.