Flash removed from etch - process explained?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
From a recent message on this list I saw a link to the 4.0r3 etch
Going to that link I see that they have removed flash
Closed source and no security support
It also says
The complete list of all accepted and rejected packages together with
rationale is on the preparation page for this revision:
Going on to that page - there is no mention of flash at all.
What is the normal Debian procedure here? How can I find out who/how
this decision was made and why?
Please note I am expressing no opinion or trolling. I'm just trying
to get more insight into the Debian 'psyche'
Your comments appreciated
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Verify this email or encrypt your email for free - see gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----