Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:17:20AM -0400, judd@wadsworth.org wrote:
> The two are not mutually exclusive. The traditional interpretation
> of
> the "eye for an eye" verse is that the punishment should fit the crime,
> but not exceed it, i.e. "an eye for an eye", not two eyes or a life.
> This was a somewhat radical concept at the time.
Well, in Romania the punishment for stealing an apple or milions of
euros is pretty similar. So not even *that* concept is correctly
applied.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?
- From: Jochen Schulz <ml@well-adjusted.de>
- Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?
- Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com>
- Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?
- From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>
- Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com>
- Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?
- Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?
- From: Raquel <raquel@thericehouse.net>
- Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?
- From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>
- Re: [OT] Good, evil and religion [WAS] Re: A way to compile 3rd party modules into deb system?