Hello Roberto. Roberto C. Sanchez, 13.03.2007 00:06: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 11:34:48PM +0100, Mathias Brodala wrote: > I would certainly trust XFS. Of course, if you don't have your machine > on an UPS, it can cause problems on a crash or power outage. How are > your video files being used? Played locally? Streamed to one or two > devices? Streamed to hundreds of devices? Only played locally and sometimes distributed and seldom streamed over a local network. > Unless you are streaming to many devices, it is likely that you are not > yet hitting a bottleneck. As they say, "if it ain't broke." That said, > do you notice a particular performance problem? Not really but it could have been that I am missing a performance boost only because I never really tried other filesystems. >>> XFS supports files up to a size of 8 >>> exabytes and filesystems also of size 8 exabytes. I am not sure of the >>> limitations on JFS. >> OK, that seems only important for enterprise levels. I don???t think that I will >> reach these sizes at the moment. >> > I read on Slashdot a while back that Seagate announced 37.5 TB drives > will be available in a few years. Ouch. I’m thinking about getting a 750GB Seagate at the moment if only the prize gets a bit lower. > Petabyte-sized home RAIDs won't be > far off :-) What I cannot really imagine at the moment might be true in a few years. Let’s see what the glory future brings. Regards, Mathias -- debian/rules
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature