Re: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 02/26/07 07:59, Wulfy wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 02/25/07 23:53, Wulfy wrote:
>>> Ron Johnson wrote:
> And no, I'm not suggesting that any other form of power generation is
> "better", they all have problems, but blatant "this is safe" arguments
> are... short-sighted.
Possibly. What they are are poor grammar.
The assertion is that they are "safe*r*" than coal. Does it really
matter if humans in 5000 years tunnel into Yucca Mountain, if there
are no humans left?
But coal is less oogey-boogey scary.
Besides, the power (a *LOT* of power) has to come from *somewhere*,
on a *large* industrial scale. Especially over in China, where coal
and auto pollution is hundreds of times worse than in the West.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----