[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Shouldn't pax (required by POSIX) have the required priority?



On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 02:21:36AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> The pax package is optional. But as the pax utility is required by
> POSIX[*], shouldn't this package be required?
> 
> [*] http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/pax.html
> 
Why?  RPM is also required by LSB and it is not "required" in Debian.
There is nothing saying that your Debian install has to be POSIX
compliant.  Remember, people build embedded devices on Debian using
alternative libc implementations and other such things.  If you want
POSIX compliance, you can install it.

Also, if you read up on the different priorities in Debian, you will see
that optional is the correct priority for pax.

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: