On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:53:33AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:13:53PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: > > Thanks to all those emacs folks that pointed out this function! > > If I can only translate the gnus function to a mutt function... > > Now if only I would switch from mutt to gnus :-) > > Could you not just use emacs as the editor for mutt? I am in the process of trying to get procmail to filter all posts through the gnus function so that when I use mutt, the post is de-uglified. I do not use emacs. and I do not want to edits posts in it, but wish emacs to process the mail. Cheers, Kev -- | .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | my web site: | | : :' : The Universal |mysite.verizon.net/kevin.mark/| | `. `' Operating System | go to counter.li.org and | | `- http://www.debian.org/ | be counted! #238656 | | my keysever: subkeys.pgp.net | my NPO: cfsg.org |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature