Re: spamcop
> On Thursday 21 September 2006 21:11, Seth Goodman wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 21, 2006 11:39 AM -0500, Stephen wrote:
> > > This is why debian-user is being constantly blacklisted -- So the
> > > onus is on Debian to fix things on their end.
> >
> > Strongly agree. Spam from USENET is part of it, but SpamCop listed the
> > server because of messages to a spamtrap. If this is correct, it had to
> > be a confirmation message :) Spam trap addresses are secret, so there's
> > no way to stop this except by talking to the DNSBL maintainers.
On 21.09.06 22:39, Pollywog wrote:
> Are you saying that SpamCop maintains spamtrap addresses and that networks
> or hosts that send spam to them are added to SpamCop's databases?
Yes, that's AFAIK how SpamCOP spamtraps work.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Reply to:
- References:
- RE: spamcop
- From: "Seth Goodman" <sethg@GoodmanAssociates.com>
- Re: spamcop
- From: Pollywog <linux-debian@shadypond.com>