Re: spamcop

[John Kelly <jak@isp2dial.com>]

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:08:20 -0500, "Seth Goodman"
<sethg@GoodmanAssociates.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, September 20, 2006 7:22 AM -0500, John Kelly wrote:

>> For the second time in the past few days, spamcop has listed
>> murphy.debian.org.  That's it.  I'm done with spamcop!

>If that machine has become a target for spammers who would like to make
>spamtraps useless (for example, taking any action that would send an
>automated confirmation message from a high-volume server to a spamtrap
>address), the answer is not to abandon SpamCop.

When spamcop admins don't have enough sense to whitelist servers like
murphy.debian.org, it's time to abandon them


>I'm willing to look into a solution if nobody else is interested.

I already have the solution.  Spamcop is now in my book on the same
page as SORBS.  The page titled "NEVER USE."