Re: Thunderbird does not show attachments any longer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 16:18:07 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Nevertheless, have you considered upgrading to 220.127.116.11, either thru
>> backports.or or the mozilla.org binary?
> I answered this elsewhere here:
Sorry. I read the thread but must have missed it.
> If ever we wanted to take a larger part of the desktop / server market, we
> have to change our attitudes.
> If I run Debian stable, apt-get should give me a proper, working system.
> What a strange approach, to suggest users follow development of their
> applications and decide to upgrade from other sources to prevent bit-rot.
> Ron, this is surely not personal. I appreciate your input, even. But if
> we wanted to convince Joe User to go for Linux (or GNU/Linux), we can't
> want to require Joe to become a geek in order to use it.
> apt-get is one of the greatest items in FOSS; superior to anything else,
> including Windoze update (of course).
> It must be and remain a one-stop item to get a system to update and for a
> user to run in order to know about the current state of your 'stable'
> system. Not Wikis, lists, googles, bit-rots, bugzillas, backports and
You're right. This bug *should* be fixed.
OTOH, IMNSHO, what the heck are you doing running Moz 1.0.2 (or
1.0.8)??????? Upgrade already!!!!!!!!!
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----