Re: Why not?
* Carl Fink <carl@finknetwork.com> [2006 Jul 14 18:51 -0500]:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:14:50PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> > s/QT/GTK|GNOME/ and you have my opinion. I can only deal with the GTK
> > apps by running the qt-gtk-engine which cleans them up very nicely and
> > gives me a clean Plastik UI.
>
> Where is that? It isn't in Testing. I'd love to replace the unusable GTK
> crap with something less clunky.
Here is what you're looking for:
http://packages.debian.org/testing/kde/gtk2-engines-gtk-qt
Not easy to find with the way the original package name is munged. It
works very nicely from KControl and sets up the GTK theme in such a way
that those apps will retain the Qt them even when running outside of
KDE in, say, IceWM.
- Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998.
http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of
My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!"
http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Why?
- From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
- Re: Why?
- From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
- Re: Why?
- From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
- Re: Why?
- From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
- Re: Why not?
- From: "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@earthlink.net>
- Re: Why not?
- From: John Hasler <jhasler@debian.org>
- Re: Why not?
- From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
- Re: Why not?
- From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
- Re: Why not?
- From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
- Re: Why not?
- From: Carl Fink <carl@finknetwork.com>