Hal Vaughan wrote: > From my observation, whenever something like this comes up on this list, > there are those who listen and are willing to pay attention to > constructive criticism and others who can't and keep saying things like > the above comment or developers that can't accept criticism and become > quite nasty with the users. As far as I know I'm the only DD participating in this thread. Please show an example of me being thin skinned and nasty with users in this thread. Steve Lamb wrote: > No, it's not, Joey. There's a difference between "Debian's policy not > allowing it to support" and "has been made to install just fine". Debian, as > a project vs. Debian as the OS. I'm pointing out the difference between "Oh, > you're on your own kid because that's BAD AND EVIL AND WRONG AND YOU'LL BURN > IN HELL!!!" versus the pragmatic approach (one that was much more evidenced in > Debian of years past) of "This'll get'cha going, it works but it's BAD AND > EVIL AND WRONG and you really should convert to something else." You continue to show evidence of not having actually read <[🔎] 20060421170836.GA32724@kitenet.net>, which gives ample evidence of the latter approach continuing to exist in Debian today. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature