[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Further installation woes WAS: trouble installing RAID and LVM.



On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:38:43PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:49:10PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 03:29:23PM -0500, hendrik@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 03:59:23PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 05:25:30PM -0500, hendrik@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > > package
> > > > > *   report-bug: Depends: pythin 2.3 which is a cirtual package
> > > >                            ^^^^^^                ^
> > > > Should really copy & paste errors, as an error in the error can be
> > > > confusing :-)
> > > 
> > > Quite agree.  Is there a way to copy and paste during installation?  At 
> > > this point I was using the text-only console apparently provided by the 
> > > installer.
> > 
> > Oh, should have spotted that. I think there is a . . . ah here:
> > 
> > less /var/log/debian-installer/messages
> > 
> > But somehow you would need access to it. :-)
> > 
> > Hang on, when did python become an essential package? This looks like it
> > is after the installation phase so maybe using script?
> H> 
> Hi Chris,
> I noticed you message but had trouble following as I dont know about
> Raid but...
> python is essential in Ubuntu and not in Debian. There was considerable
> debate about this in the last 1 1/2 on debian-devel if you want to wade
> throught the messages as someone wanted to make it essential in Debian.
> If this is a pure debian system, this would seem like a bug.
> Cheers,
> Kev

This is a pure AMD64 Debian testing system.

-- hendrik

> -- 
> |  .''`.  == Debian GNU/Linux == |       my web site:       |
> | : :' :      The  Universal     | debian.home.pipeline.com |
> | `. `'      Operating System    | go to counter.li.org and |
> |   `-    http://www.debian.org/ |    be counted! #238656   |
> |     my keysever: pgp.mit.edu   |     my NPO: cfsg.org     |




Reply to: