On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:04:24AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2006-02-09 15:27:22, schrieb Digby Tarvin: > > There is nothing incorrect in my headers as far as I know, but I do > > use a 'Reply-to:' to make sure that mail goes to my mailbox rather > > than just back to wherever I happened to originate a message from... This is an example of what Reply-to is actually for. It is not munging when done by the original poster. Everything should work as expected; from mutt, 'r' should go to the original poster (as specified by the Reply-to: header) and 'L' still goes to the list. > Do not do this!!! > How can someone reply to the list if you are munging the Headers? In mutt: 'L' (I just tried it on my sid box) > Note: I have setup my "mutt" to ignore the "Reply-To:" Header. How can a user get a personal response if you ignore his request for responses to go to a different address than the one used to send from? Ignoring the Reply-to: header is as bad as a mailing list munging it. -- Rob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature