Re: XOrg+Radeon = No Direct Rendering?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 23:44:54 -0800
seeker5528@comcast.net wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:53:47 +0100
> Renato Serodio <renato.serodio@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Section "Device"
> > Identifier "ATI Technologies, Inc. Radeon R250 Lf
> > [FireGL 9000]" Driver "radeon"
> > BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
> >
> > Option "UseInternalAGPART" "yes"
> > Option "RenderAccel" "true"
> > Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
> > EndSection
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R200 QL [Radeon
> 8500 LE]"
> Driver "ati"
> BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
> EndSection
>
> I don't know if it is valid to specify radeon any more? I had a
> problem with it at one point and when I did 'dpkg-reconfigure
> xserver-xorg' it wasn't shown as an option anymore. I never tried any
> of the extra options so I don't have any input to give there.
Yes, radeon is still valid. I'm still using it. Both radeon and ati
seem to work for my 9200, but radeon is slightly faster in my
experience.
HTH,
Jacob
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD7K3ckpJ43hY3cTURAqvCAKCMN3O53kiD0Wby7/EcQJx7ILVXhgCgpmUK
X7qxB+CTu6F2P1xJx/a4AFs=
=BjX2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: