I'd meant this as an off-list reply but, well, the TMDA supporter
apparently doesn't post his valid address (or has a creative one
supplied).
on Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:22:23PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs (nospam@codegnome.org) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 08:46:34AM +0530, Rishi wrote:
>
> >Any recommendations for C/R spam tools available for me to plugin?
>
> I use TMDA. It's not actively supported these days, but it's extrememly
> effective and quite stable.
It's not?
Hrm. Apparently, no, it's not:
future of TMDA (Jason R. Mastaler)
Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:31:03 -0600
http://mla.libertine.org/tmda-workers/2005-04/msg00000.html
Considered harmful is now "considered dead".
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Confusion is permanent; its focus shifts with time.
- Karsten M. Self, confused, as usual.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature