Re: Solaris: The Most Advanced OS?
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
>
>>I've had a little experience with Solaris 10, and so far, I far prefer
>>Debian. But then I'm not using "enterprise level" hardware or have
>>"enterprise level" needs, which might make all the difference.
>
>
> This is all I need to know about "Enterprise level". At work they got a
> new HP server. New rack, all the accessories, external HDs for something or
> another, tape drive for backup. Looked sweet to be honest. Then the
> following conversation occured:
>
> "Nice. Do we have the license yet?"
>
> "Nope, that's coming next week."
>
> .... Word for word. In short we had the machine, it was mounted, plugged
> in, ready to go and we couldn't turn it on because we hadn't yet received the
> license. All the "Enterprise Level" features in the world fall flat on their
> face when one cedes control of one's hardware to an outside company.
I think Enterprise just means paying more for the same stuff with a
brand name?
Reply to: