[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

dist-upgrade wierdness



I'm trying to do a dist-upgrade my unstable box and am getting wierd
packages in the "NEW packages will be installed:" list. Details below:

~# apt-get -s dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  apache2-common apache2-mpm-prefork libapache2-mod-php4 ssl-cert
The following packages have been kept back:
  arts epiphany-extensions gksu udev
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libapache-mod-php4 libgphoto2-2 libneon23 openssh-client
openssh-server php4 php4-common
7 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
Inst openssh-server [1:4.2p1-4] (1:4.2p1-5 Debian:unstable) []
Inst openssh-client [1:4.2p1-4] (1:4.2p1-5 Debian:unstable)
Inst ssl-cert (1.0-11 Debian:unstable)
Inst apache2-common (2.0.54-5 Debian:unstable)
Inst apache2-mpm-prefork (2.0.54-5 Debian:unstable)
Inst libapache-mod-php4 [4:4.4.0-2] (4:4.4.0-3 Debian:unstable) []
Inst php4-common [4:4.4.0-2] (4:4.4.0-3 Debian:unstable)
Inst libapache2-mod-php4 (4:4.4.0-3 Debian:unstable)
Inst libgphoto2-2 [2.1.6-4] (2.1.6-5 Debian:unstable)
Inst libneon23 [0.23.9.dfsg.3-5] (0.23.9.dfsg.3-6 Debian:unstable)
Inst php4 [4:4.4.0-2] (4:4.4.0-3 Debian:unstable)
Conf openssh-client (1:4.2p1-5 Debian:unstable)
Conf openssh-server (1:4.2p1-5 Debian:unstable)
Conf ssl-cert (1.0-11 Debian:unstable)
Conf apache2-common (2.0.54-5 Debian:unstable)
Conf apache2-mpm-prefork (2.0.54-5 Debian:unstable)
Conf php4-common (4:4.4.0-3 Debian:unstable)
Conf libapache-mod-php4 (4:4.4.0-3 Debian:unstable)
Conf libapache2-mod-php4 (4:4.4.0-3 Debian:unstable)
Conf libgphoto2-2 (2.1.6-5 Debian:unstable)
Conf libneon23 (0.23.9.dfsg.3-6 Debian:unstable)
Conf php4 (4:4.4.0-3 Debian:unstable)


I'm running apache and I don't know why apt is trying to install
apache2-common and apache2-mpm-prefork. Does anyone see anything wrong
here or is it expected?

Thanks,
/KS



Reply to: