On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 01:10:26PM +0100, Glyn Tebbutt wrote: > I to used both apt-proxy and apt-cacher and prefer apt-cacher as I had a > weird timeout delay on apt-proxy and it was'nt included within sarge > (when I started looking at theses solutions) apt-cacher works fanastic > though, I just reinstalled my server and used the old *deb's apt-cacher > had stored, didn't have to download a thing, saved alot of bandwidth. > I don't know why someone said apt-cacher doesn't store the packages.gz > as my setup (and its a new setup) stores the *.gz files fine. > Also my machine isn't internet facing it's an internel server (behind a > firewall) so i've never come upto problems with routering of ports. > Another vote for apt-cacher here It was fairly well documented (at least that is how I remember it) that pipelining was enabled in one version. This caused problems and disabling would let apt-proxy return to its former behavior. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
Attachment:
pgpz06Sp2Z7Lj.pgp
Description: PGP signature