[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: vesafb-tng



Am 27.05.2005 um 20:17 schrieb Gutemberg A. Vieira:

> Anyone is using the vesafb-tng[1] for framebuffer? I am trying to patch the
> kernel-source-2.6.11 but I can't do it right. Have anyone succeded? I get
> something like this:
> 
> # cat ../vesafb-tng-0.9-rc6-2.6.11-rc1.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run
> patching file Documentation/fb/vesafb.txt
> patching file arch/i386/boot/video.S
> patching file drivers/video/Kconfig
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 329.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/video/Kconfig.rej
> patching file drivers/video/Makefile
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 100 with fuzz 1 (offset 4 lines).
> patching file drivers/video/fbmem.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 52 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 1204 (offset 25 lines).
> patching file drivers/video/vesafb-thread.c
> patching file drivers/video/vesafb-tng.c
> patching file include/video/vesa.h

The patch applies almost completely.  You can probably easily apply
the single failed hunk manually.


Regards,
Dennis

-- 
Send personal mail to dennis@... only.  Off-list 
mails to lists@stosberg.net will not reach me.



Reply to: