Re: wuftpd or proftpd: comments please
I've had very good experiences with pureftpd;
Being a relative nooB I had to setup a low bandwith ftp server with:
- pam accounts, limited to /home/username and
- one admin account with access to the whole filesystem and
- chrooted virtual accounts.
I used pureftpd and had, without any former knowledge of setting up ftp
servers, everything set up in an evening due to pureftpd's easy setup
and good documentation on their website. Works like a dream.
YMMV
Groet,
Peter Teunissen
-- Never argue with idiots; they'll drag you down to their own level
and beat you on experience.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.12
GFA/P/IT$ d+(++) s: a C++$>+++$ UB/L+>++++$ P L++ !E W++
N- o? K? w$>!w !O M+(++) V? PS++ PE- Y+ PGP- t 5?
X- !R !tv b++(+++) DI++++ D+ G>++ e++ h--- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
On 8-mrt-05, at 15:52, Colin Ingram wrote:
Rhys Hardwick wrote:
I know that there are two recommended ftp servers for Debian: wuftpd
and proftpd. I was wondering if anyone had any comments or
suggestions about which to use. If it helps, I am going to be
running it on a low bandwidth server for editing web sites, and for
use as a remote file server for general usage.
I use vsftp, its small, secure, and and severs my low bandwidth
purposes. http://vsftpd.beasts.org/
apt-get vsftpd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a
subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: