[Legal] Firefox not truly Free?
I don't know what to make of this statement:
The main disadvantage of the deal with Google is that native language
versions of Firefox are not permitted to change the default search
engine to one that is more useful for searching Web pages in a
I don't want to be a chicken little, but in what sense is this statement
valid? It seems to have extraordinary implications, not in the least
that Firefox and Mozilla would have to be considered Non-Free.
Is it merely advistory or a request? I know there was some talk about
Debian Thunderbird; here's some more fuel for the fire!
[If this gets moved to firstname.lastname@example.org, cc me, b/c I'm not on that list.)