On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 10:47 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote: > > unstable is described as suited for "...laptops and desktops on non-critical > > systems..." > > testing is described as "... can be used for desktop systems that need more > > stability..." > > > > I think this both is wrong. Unstable and testing should not be described as > > suited for desktops - they are development branches of debian, which are > > likely to break, which break and... so on. Most of you know :) > > Agreed. Unstable is recommended only for people that "know what they are > doing". Certainly not for desktop usage, or anything like that. Hmmmph. Sid is great as a desktop. I'm running Sid now. Why would you say that it's not a good desktop? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. After seeing all the viruses, trojan horses, worms and Reply mails from stupidly-configured anti-virus software that's been hurled upon the internet for the last 3 years, and the time/money that is spent protecting against said viruses, trojan horses & worms, I can only conclude that Microsoft is dangerous to the internet and American commerce, and it's software should be banned.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part