Re: numlockx problem?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: numlockx problem?
From: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 07:37:40 -0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20041228093739.GA16332@ime.usp.br>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20041228050418.GB4158@yggdrasil.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] 41CFA16C.6030305@conwaycorp.net> <[🔎] 20041228050418.GB4158@yggdrasil.localdomain>

On Dec 27 2004, Greg Norris wrote:
> Normally you're prompted for conffile replacement when the package is
> upgraded, but I believe this can be overridden via /etc/dpkg/dpkg.conf.

This is something that I don't understand: why aren't conffiles replacement
handled by debconf? That would be nice just for consistency's sake.

Curiously yours, Rogério Brito.

-- 
Learn to quote e-mails decently at:
http://pub.tsn.dk/how-to-quote.php
http://learn.to/quote
http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/toppost.htm

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: numlockx problem?
  - From: Andrea Vettorello <andrea.vettorello@gmail.com>

References:
- numlockx problem?
  - From: Rob Benton <rob.benton@conwaycorp.net>
- Re: numlockx problem?
  - From: Greg Norris <haphazard@kc.rr.com>

Prev by Date: Boot problem with a moved ext3 partition
Next by Date: Re: Boot problem with a moved ext3 partition
Previous by thread: Re: numlockx problem?
Next by thread: Re: numlockx problem?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread