[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]



On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:50:39AM -0400 or thereabouts, Chris Metzler wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:26:50 -0400
> "S.D.A." <dallan@rogers.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:01:00PM -0700 or thereabouts, Rodney D. Myers
> > wrote:
> >  
> >> Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he started new threads
> > 
> > That's one of the reasons why I dropped Sylpheed early on!
> 
> Except I use Sylpheed, and it threaded the posts just fine, tacked onto
> the previous unrelated threads.

Interesting.

> > The reason why they appeared differently for you, is that Sylpheed most
> > likely only sorts by subject/date, (aka psuedo threading).
>
> Nope.

Must have been fixed in later releases. When I was using it off/on several
years ago, (if my memory is correct), it didn't do proper threading.

Does it do message-id threading by default, or is it user configurable?




-- 
Steve
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  Thursday Aug 26 2004 03:58:01 PM EDT
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hors d'oeuvres -- a ham sandwich cut into forty pieces.
		-- Jack Benny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: