Re: Bogus reply-to
On 2004-08-09, Brian Nelson penned:
>
> Of course it's a valid answer. It implies that reading the lists on
> gmane is underpowered for what she wants and should change her setup.
> It's already been made clear the problem is on her end (yeah, it
> sucks, but that's raelity) since there are no other workable
> solutions.
Gmane isn't underpowered. Apparently, though, email headers are.
Seems to me that my current solution *is* workable (enough), though
highly inelegant and improper.
--
monique
Ask smart questions, get good answers:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Reply to: