Re: Good front end for small postgress dtabases?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:57:51PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
> Nano Nano(email@example.com) is reported to have said:
> > Question to all: I literally specify that you need automake 1.7 and
> > autoconf 2.50: is that wise?
> I wondered about. I am running testing and have automake 1.4-p6-2,
> which is the latest version for testing/unstable, or so apt-get tells
> me. The ./proj fails because its looking for aclocal-1.7. The latest
> automake has aclocal-1.4.
> I won't go out to find an automake thats not a debian packgage, but
> thats me.
I'm running SID. I expect you can edit the AMVER and ACVER in proj
and/or proj.c to the version numbers you have and it will work. (proj
is generated by running "gcc proj.c; ./a.out".)
But when I post 0.2 that has the automake;autoconf step already run, I
expect you won't have to have the matching automake/autoconf installed;
you'll just run ./configure. I'll take a bit of time and make the
README halfway decent, because I'll need to document schema.xml before
you can use it at all.
Hang tight, and thanks for your eyes.