FW: odd df results
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jochen Daum [mailto:jochen.daum@cans.co.nz]
> Sent: Thursday, 13 November 2003 8:24 a.m.
> To: Ron Johnson
> Subject: RE: odd df results
>
>
> Hi !
>
> > From: Ron Johnson [mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 12 November 2003 6:42 p.m.
> > To: Debian-User
> > Subject: Re: odd df results
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 22:52, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > > Quoting Jeffrey L. Taylor <jeff@austinblues.dyndns.org>:
> > > > Quoting Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>:
> > > > > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 19:44, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > > > > > Quoting Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 17:14, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > > > > > > > I am getting the following result on my
> > filesystem. How do I correct
> > > > > > > > it?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > # df
> > > > > > > > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used
> > Available Use% Mounted on
> > > > > > > > /dev/hda1 -1006130973579 1
> > 0 24% /
> > > > > > > > /dev/hda2 -1006139352819 1
> > 0 8% /home
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Woody? Sarge, what?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How big is /dev/hda?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Woody: fileutils 4.1-10
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /dev/hda is approximately 8.9GB
> > > > > >
> > > > > > # df -Hi
> > > > > > Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse%
> > Mounted on
> > > > > > /dev/hda1 489k 53k 436k 11% /
> > > > > > /dev/hda2 489k 11k 478k 3% /home
> > > > >
> > > > > How big is the complete /dev/hda?
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm using fileutils 5.0-5 from testing, and it
> handles a 120GB
> > > > > /dev/hda perfectly:
> > > > > $ df
> > > > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use%
> Mounted on
> > > > > /dev/hda3 7874560 161148 7313396 3% /
> > > > > /dev/hda2 46668 2871 41388 7% /boot
> > > > > /dev/hda5 7874528 2264344 5210168 31% /usr
> > > > > /dev/hda6 7874528 1088952 6385560 15% /var
> > > > > /dev/hda7 7874528 561168 6913344 8% /home
> > > > > /dev/hda8 87953148 1152008 86801140 2% /data
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Not particularly big, approx. 8.9GB. That's what's
> surprising.
> > > >
> > > > I may try the testing fileutils if the dependencies
> don't break
> > > > everything.
> > > >
> > > > Jeffrey
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Whatever it is, it is not limited to df. When I try and
> > run amanda
> > > from another computer, backing up this machine, I get
> this error:
> > >
> > > ERROR: maelstorm: [dir /tmp/amanda needs 64KB, only has
> > -2147483648KB available.]
> > >
> > > maelstorm is the Debian machine. The AMANDA server is a
> > SuSE machine.
> >
> > Maybe an fsck is in order?
>
> Had the same problem and had to downgrade util linux to
> util-linux/stable uptodate 2.11n-4
>
> HTH, Jochen
Reply to: