on Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:22:00PM -0600, Bob Proulx (bob@proulx.com) wrote: > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > moseley@hank.org wrote: > > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > Here's my list of aliases. Do any processes/applications send to these > > > > > addresses? > > > My "problem" is that those aliases are well known. So the spammers > > > are now using those addresses for both sending me spam and for use as > > > forged addresses to others (and then I get the bounces). > > > > By all means filter mail to these aliases against spam and viruses. > > > > In some cases, *not* reading this mail, bouncing it, or otherwise > > indicating that the address is invalid or inactive, may result in your > > site being listed with services such as rfc-ignorant.org > > I think the only two that you *must* receive mail for is 'postmaster' > and 'abuse', IIRC. So I think the others can be bounced without fear > of any problems. http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/ lists: - DSN <> - postmaster - abuse - whois - ipwhois Failure to respect other recommended addresses may or may not result in responses or countermeasures by individual sites. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Moderator, Free Software Law Discussion mailing list: http://lists.alt.org/mailman/listinfo/fsl-discuss/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature