RE: failed upgrade to unstable... libxrender1
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 18:46, Michael Kahle wrote:
> James Strandboge wrote:
> >On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 16:28, Michael Kahle wrote:
> >>>Did you have the gnome2.2 woody backport installed?
> >>
> >> Yes I did. I was runny woody. I then installed the backport at a
> >> later date. I the decided to switch to testing.
> >>
> >Glad dselect helped. It is not recommended to go from the backport
> >to testing, but instead the backport to sid. The reason being is
> >that much of the backport is much farther ahead of testing.
> >
> >I did correct a dependency issue with libxrender1.1 (which is from
> >the backport) and libxrender1. You won't be able to install
> >libxrender1 now without removing libxrender1.1. This should help
> >people attempting what you did.
>
> I apologize. I went from stable to unstable (sid). I hope that my
> slip did not prompt the propagation of a change that was unnecessary
> or worse wrong!
Not at all. You having the problem clearly showed it needed to be
done. When I initially packaged libxrender1.1, there was no such
libxrender1 in sid. I needed to account for it.
Jamie
--
Email: jstrand1@rochester.rr.com
GPG/PGP ID: 26384A3A
Fingerprint: D9FF DF4A 2D46 A353 A289 E8F5 AA75 DCBE 2638 4A3A
Reply to: