Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (was Re: Look at

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (was Re: Look at
From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:19:25 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87ispaqsqq.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030806171013.6e644817.sl@eskimo.com> (Scott C. Linnenbringer's message of "Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:10:13 -0500")
References: <[🔎] 20030806161003.GA802@earthlink.net> <[🔎] 20030806171013.6e644817.sl@eskimo.com>

At 2003-08-06T22:10:13Z, "Scott C. Linnenbringer" <sl@eskimo.com> writes:

> alanc@eskimo.com is not a valid email address.

Neither is "alanc@kanga.honeypot.net", which is how it appears on my
system.  Or "alanc@`hostname`" for everyone else.
-- 
Kirk Strauser

Attachment: pgp68KM7Zr5wE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Challenge-response mail filter. Goodwin's Law...
  - From: Greg Folkert <greg@gregfolkert.net>

References:
- Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (was Re: Look at
  - From: Alan Connor <alanc@localhost>
- Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (was Re: Look at
  - From: "Scott C. Linnenbringer" <sl@eskimo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: base system install failed: debootstrap poos
Next by Date: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (was Re: Look at
Previous by thread: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (was Re: Look at
Next by thread: Challenge-response mail filter. Goodwin's Law...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread