Re: debian
Quoting "Jamin W. Collins" <jcollins@asgardsrealm.net>:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 03:21:39PM -0700, John Sunderhaus wrote:
>
> > But your point is well taken; you can productively run X on an
> > underpowered machine - but I'll bet you aren't happy.
>
> I'd bet quite the contrary. Chances are they use it because they *are*
> happy with it. I much prefer my Blackbox based X configuration to
> anything else available for Windows, Mac, or Linux. Why? Because it's
> what *I* chose. Not what someone else decided I should use. Does it
> have all the latest eye candy? Hell *no*. That's one of the main
> reasons I use it. I don't want all that extra overhead (and yes, my
> system has more than enough processor power to spare). The point is,
> it's all about choice.
Ditto. My PII-366 ThinkPad with 128MB RAM runs Fluxbox on X like a champ. So
does my Athlon 1.2Ghz desktop with 768MB RAM; I don't feel the need to run a
bloated desktop environment simply because my hardware can handle it.
M. Kirchhoff
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: debian
- From: "Arthur H. Johnson II" <arthur@usol.com>
- Re: debian
- From: "Mark L. Kahnt" <kahnt@hosehead.dyndns.org>
- References:
- debian
- From: "Joyce, Matthew" <MJoyce@ccia.org.au>
- Re: debian
- From: cr <cr@orcon.net.nz>
- Re: debian
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
- Re: debian
- From: cr <cr@orcon.net.nz>
- Re: debian
- From: John Sunderhaus <jsunderhaus@cox.net>
- Re: debian
- From: Bijan Soleymani <bijan@psq.com>
- Re: debian
- From: John Sunderhaus <jsunderhaus@cox.net>
- Re: debian
- From: "Jamin W. Collins" <jcollins@asgardsrealm.net>