Re: CVS_RSH for :ext: CVS access
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:50:29AM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Colin Watson said on Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:42:07AM +0100:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:46:49PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> > > * Mike M (linux-support@earthlink.net) [030612 21:48]:
> > > > On the Debian system, when I query evironments vars, I do not set
> > > > CVS_RSH set. Why do the Debian systems allow the :ext: access
> > > > method to work without having the CVS_RSH var set?
> > >
> > > The default is to use rsh. If you've installed ssh, but not
> > > rsh-client, then /usr/bin/rsh is a symlink to ssh. (Well, indirectly,
> > > anyway, through the alternatives system).
> >
> > ... for now, anyway. There's a bug report asking for this to be removed
> > since ssh no longer implements the rsh fallback that it used to
> > implement; I'm inclined to agree, so it may disappear soon.
>
> ARG! Why why why!
Because if you type 'rsh some-rsh-server' it does Weird Stuff because
ssh doesn't know how to talk to rsh servers any more?
> Right now, everything that has silly default settings to use rsh
> automatically uses ssh, which means that things Just Work in a secure
> environment. If this happens, would it be possible to change all of
> the upstream defaults to use ssh instead of rsh instead?
Well, you have to do this on every other system anyway (see the
confusion in this very thread) ... I dunno.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: