Re: wine and IE
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
>-- Gary Turner <kk5st@sbcglobal.net> wrote
>(on Thursday, 20 February 2003, 09:27 PM -0600):
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:43:29AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
>> >> If only that were true. Every page I produce is 100% W3C compliant.
>> >> That's not enough. In the area of CSS alone, IE for Windows is not
>> >> compliant, while IE for Mac is.
>> >
>> >So slap the appropriate W3C compliant buttons on there so if they want
>> >to test it out in Windows IE they can find out it's not you who sucks.
>>
>> It's not really a question of who sucks and who blows ;) Java Script,
>> Flash, frames, tables, and graphics are compliant technologies, so does
>
>Actually, I beg to differ regarding Flash -- if a technology requires
>that the browser utilize a plugin in order to work, I wouldn't call it
>standardized. Otherwise, spot on.
You're right, of course. Its pervasive ubiquity and seamless
integration make me forget that it's not a browser feature.
>
[...]
> Once my deadlines aren't looming so heavily, I'll try and see if I
>can get some of the solutions presented working.
Good luck. It might be worthwhile to use a junker loaded with Windows
for testing a number of browsers. I've found, for example, that
Mozilla, Opera, and BrowseX act slightly different on Windows compared
to Linux. And don't forget Mac.
--
gt kk5st@sbcglobal.net
Friends don't let friends use Flash.
Reply to: