Re: Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 released

[Carlos Sousa <csousa@tvtel.pt>]

On Sat, 20 Jul 2002 00:20:52 +0100 Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
wrote:

> Current situation:
> 
>   stable   = woody
>   testing  = sarge
>   unstable = sid
> ...
> sarge (testing) is currently equal to woody (stable), but as of
> tomorrow or thereabouts it'll start being gradually updated with new
> packages from sid in the same way testing was updated throughout the
> last release cycle.

So, if I understand correctly, sources.list lines referring to "stable",
"testing" and "unstable" won't have to be touched if one means to
maintain the same distribution approach (following testing, in my case).

The security-related lines are a different matter, though. I have the
following lines:

deb http://non-US.debian.org/debian-non-US/ stable/non-US main contrib
   non-free
deb http://non-US.debian.org/debian-non-US/ woody/non-US main contrib
   non-free

Can I now delete the second one?

Also, I suppose the new testing will, as the old one did, have to go
without a security archive. Is it so? If not, what would be the right
sources.list lines for it?

Could anyone please post what would be a good set of sources.list lines
for a good security coverage?

Thanks.

-- 
Carlos Sousa
http://vbc.dyndns.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org