[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The implications of installing from the unstable release



On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 19:43:12 +0100 Matthew Hambley
<matthew@aether.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> I am keen to try out the 'subversion' version control program for which
> there is a package in the unstable pool.  After having read the
> apt-howto it appears that the best way to do this would be to add lines
> such as
> 
> > deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
> 
> to my sources.list file and specify
> 
> > APT::Default-Release "testing";
> 
> in apt.conf.

Yep, that'll do it.

> Are there any gotcha's I should be aware of in doing this.  for
> instance, what happens when there is a more recent version of a package
> in unstable and I 'apt-get upgrade'?  

Nothing, that's the beauty of the Default-Release setting.

> What happens when a package
> migrates from unstable to testing?

Just the same as now.

-- 
Jamin W. Collins


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: