Re: Gnome

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Gnome
From: Oki DZ <okidz@pindad.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 07:46:04 +0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020719074604.A9837@bdg.pindad.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1026989070.3491.4.camel@polonius>; from peter.whysall@ntlworld.com on Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 17:44:30 +0700
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1020717154102.2388E-100000@okidz.pindad.co.id> <[🔎] 20020717133022.GB706@singnet.com.sg> <[🔎] 20020717160803.GA22944@hachi> <[🔎] 20020718035746.GA1862@singnet.com.sg> <20020718114803.V31490@bdg.pindad.com> <[🔎] 20020718115435.X31490@bdg.pindad.com> <[🔎] 20020718052507.GB2328@singnet.com.sg> <[🔎] 1026989070.3491.4.camel@polonius>

On 18-07-2002 17:44 Peter Whysall wrote:

I'm using the GNOME2 packages from experimental, with a priority 1000
pin on experimental.


So how is it? Any faster, any better looking?
And speaking about the stability of the apps, how are they going?

TIA,
Oki


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gnome
  - From: Vineet Kumar <debian-user@virtual.doorstop.net>

References:
- Gnome 2
  - From: Oki DZ <okidz@pindad.com>
- Re: Gnome 2
  - From: Willy S <spamtrap@bozz.com>
- Re: Gnome 2
  - From: Cameron Matheson <cmatheson3@hotpop.com>
- Re: Gnome 2
  - From: Willy S <spamtrap@bozz.com>
- Re: Gnome
  - From: Oki DZ <okidz@pindad.com>
- Re: Gnome
  - From: Willy S <spamtrap@bozz.com>
- Re: Gnome
  - From: Peter Whysall <peter.whysall@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: a question on performance
Next by Date: vimrc for perl programming
Previous by thread: Re: Gnome
Next by thread: Re: Gnome
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread