Re: Implications of using g++-3.0
C has a defined interface standard, c++ does not (the biggest weakness of
c++ as admitted by Stroustrup himself)
----- Original Message -----
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <email@example.com>
Cc: "Ross Boylan" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: Implications of using g++-3.0
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 23:09:34 -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > If I use g++-3.0, do I need to build most of my own libraries?
> In my limited experience, it works fine with 2.95-compiled C libraries,
> not C++ ones. Those you need to rebuild.
> "But if you look carefully at their [Microsoft's] encryption algorithm,
> simply XOR the password with 'susageP', Pegasus spelled backwards. Pegasus
> is the code name of Windows CE. This is so pathetic it's staggering."
> Bruce Schneier in http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-9911.html
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact