Re: lame: which version?
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 04:09:48 -0800
Erik Steffl <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> since lame seems to be the best mp3 encoder and there's no .deb
> there's a question - which version to use? the 3.70 seems to be quite
> old but the newer one 3.89beta is, well, beta. Does anybody have
> experience with how good the beta is? I am mainly interested in sound
> quality, not speed (or other features).
I'm using 3.89beta for a while now, and I'm very satisfied with the
results. Options I use are: lame --vbr-mtrh -V0 -mj -q1 -b96 --lowpass
19.5 --athtype 3 -Z -X0 BTW, there's a deb on http://marillat.free.fr/