[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: compiling a kernel?



I did it!!!

As root I checked disk space, and did: make-kpkg --revision=3:custom.1.0 kernel_image (with an underscore).
And it works, I get the image.deb and after dpkg -i it is installed.

After rebooting it's a bit dissapointing that my new kernel will not work, but I'm going to start to find out why that is.
When somebody allready have an idea about this error:
     kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt -464c, errno=8

Ok, I start reading about this.
Hans



On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 12:30:33AM +0000, Hans Steinraht wrote:
> 
> -- 
> Hi,
> 
> I just started with Debian, installed the compact unstable version and came to the conclusion that I had to compile a new kernel to let Debian do the things I want.
> 
> This is the firsttime I'm doing this, so I followed the steps described in the Debian GNU/Linux FAQ, and in the README file that came with the 2.2.19-kernel.
> 
> - make-kpkg clean
> - make menuconfig
> - make-kpkg --revision Custum.1 kernel-image
> 
> All looks to go well, the kernel and modules are build (vmlinuz appears in /usr/src/linux and in modules I see the modules that I choose).
> 
> Then the process stops.
> This is the last text that I see on my screen:
> 
>      make INSTALL_MOD_PATH=/usr/src/linux/debian/tmp-image
>           modules-install
>      make[2]: Entering directory '/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.19'
> 
> Is there someone who can tell me what the reason is for this?
> 
> Thanks,
> Hans
>  
> 
> 
> 
>                        -- 
>        
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

-- 



                       -- 
        -<->-<->-<->-<   >-<->-<->-<->-    
    ---------  hans@artofakt.com  ---------
     -----  hsteinraht@bwirelezz.com  ----
          -<->-<->-         -<->-<->-
                     <   >                             
                      



Reply to: