Re: uptime

[Martin F Krafft <madduck@madduck.net>]

also sprach Robert Waldner (on Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:01:26AM +0200):
> Not to give NT any honour, but that´s probably FW-1. It runs reasonably
>  (for commercial-firewall-software - values of) stable on AIX, Solaris and
>  Debian, but the NT-port is...utter crap.

well, that's probably true. but how can you port potentially good
software (i can't quite classify fw-1 as good, but it is a good start)
to a visual patch to a useless extension to a minor patch release for
32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit
operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written
by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.

ever done MFC programming? or windoze API for that sake? aaaaaaaah!

> The Policy Editor, OTOH, is quite nice.

sure, but there are better. i forgot the name of the one i have in
mind, i'll post it tomorrow from the office.

martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
-- 
http://www.unix-vs-nt.org/kirch/