Re: Is Redhat that bad - a question.
On Fri, 18 May 2001 23:00:40 you wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2001, David Underwood wrote:
> > I really don't know enough to comment on anything posted in that
> > my Linux knolwedge experiance / knoledge is'nt that extensive.
> > I am aware though that the Debian policy is much stronger in
> > the 'packaging issue'. Presumably this is one of the contibuting
> > to it's 'legendary' stability.
I'll post on this. EVERY dist of linux has it's pro's and
con's. In favor of RH we actually HAD to use it due to the
support of our DPT raid controller(s) on our two servers.
I contacted SuSE about support, nada. The code is free
btw. RH isn't exactly "evil"... you just have to set it up
correctly. (wow, what a concept!) I run Debian by default,
but then I'm open to varius dists.
I told SCO tech support how to support HST modems..., and
they didn't charge me the normal rate of $100.00 per
Printing in Debian sucks, fix it. ;-(